Reg
Posts: 112
Joined: Dec. 2008
|
Dembski gets classier: "I think Dawkins would prefer to surf porn at work and pay hookers rather than give money to help orphans."
It's False Dichotomy Bingo, which is fun and easy for anyone to play:
This raises an interesting question for William Dembski: If we had to choose one or the other, helping “poor sick children” by (1) frequenting at taxpayer’s expense porn sites that pay these children's mothers a cut, the porn sites constituting a strictly non-scientific activity which stimulates his nonmaterial consciousness or by (2) donating money to charities that research the childhood diseases, using biological methods rooted in the Theory of Evolution, these charities constituting a secular materialistic activity, which should we prefer? I suspect WD, given his virulent hatred of secular materialism, would opt for (1).
--------------
"Even though I am not a creationist by any reasonable definition ... the Cambrian explosion was doubtless the work of God in my view but I would say that of all creation." - Denyse O'Leary, Oct 17, 2009.
|
