oldmanintheskydidntdoit
Posts: 4999
Joined: July 2006
|
| Quote (steve_h @ Sep. 19 2009,12:30) | | Maybe this is a close as Dembski is capable of getting to admitting that they got the algorithm wrong. |
Dembski:
| Quote | | These are by far the best candidates we have received to date. |
On what criteria is he basing that I wonder? Best in what way? You could have a million line version and as long as the output was correct it would be just as "good" as any other.
Would the candidates not be measured against how he thinks Weasel operates? So has he now had an epiphany? Did he go read TBW for the first time or what?
Will he now update his recent paper I wonder?
EDIT: Not that either example represents Weasel, no mutation rate etc.
--------------
I also mentioned that He'd have to give me a thorough explanation as to *why* I must "eat human babies".
FTK
if there are even critical flaws in Gauger’s work, the evo mat narrative cannot stand
Gordon Mullings
|
