stevestory
Posts: 13407
Joined: Oct. 2005
|
LOL. Dembski tries to 'reason' with one of his subjects.
| Quote | #3
If a Young Earth seems a better fit, what is the major reason for rejecting it?
There are unanswered questions on all sides. Why choose conventional darwinite ‘wisdom?
They are certainly wrong on other issues.
Comment by mmadigan — May 13, 2006 @ 8:06 am
|
| Quote | #4
Mmadigan: Astrophysics and geology are serious sciences. Darwinian evolution is not. –WmAD
Comment by William Dembski — May 13, 2006 @ 10:13 am
|
| Quote | #5
Respectfully, I consider myself a serious scientist, with no religious predeliction.
I was erroneously misled by darwinian mythologies in my youth. Astrophysics has many
‘old earth’ problems. And except for the haphazard radiodating inculcated with circular reasoning,
I have yet to see insurmountable problems for a Young Earth Geology.
So again, what is unacceptable except the Established Religion Consensus?
Comment by mmadigan — May 13, 2006 @ 5:34 pm
|
| Quote | #6
Erroneously misled is a redundancy. Have you read Gerald Schroeder?
Comment by mmadigan — May 13, 2006 @ 5:38 pm
|
|
