Schroedinger's Dog
Posts: 1692
Joined: Jan. 2009
|
Well, if it's not creationism, it's at least teleology, which isn't very far.
The main arguments George Olshevsky puts up front for his theory are that a ground-based evolution is "unlikely" and that he "doesn't believe" it's possible on any time scale (I am grossly paraphrasing and simplifying).
There is no real positive, evidence-supported claims for his reasoning. At best he is trying to open the way to a new classification system, based on nothing solid whatsoever. At worst, he's a closet creationist.
One way or the other, the only thing he's achieving right now is feeding the AIG nonsense.
I don't call that science...
--------------
"Hail is made out of water? Are you really that stupid?" Joe G
"I have a better suggestion, Kris. How about a game of hide and go fuck yourself instead." Louis
"The reason people use a crucifix against vampires is that vampires are allergic to bullshit" Richard Pryor
|
