oldmanintheskydidntdoit
Posts: 4999
Joined: July 2006
|
| Quote (Daniel Smith @ May 02 2009,18:42) | To my knowledge, the "tooth fairy" has never been defined as an omniscient being.
Since life requires that - by the same logic, the tooth fairy is ruled out. |
I hereby define the "tooth fairy" as an omniscient omnipotent being who, while it can control all space-time, chooses to deal only with teeth and the origin of life.
Therefore life requires the "tooth fairy" and the "tooth fairy" explains the origin of life and is necessary for the origin of life. After all, without life there are no teeth!
Will that do? Or do you demand that I dress up in some odd clothes first like your priests do before my declarations are "true" and are accepted by you as the directly (honestly, I'm not pretending or deluded) communicated word of whatever magic man in the sky you believe in?
--------------
I also mentioned that He'd have to give me a thorough explanation as to *why* I must "eat human babies".
FTK
if there are even critical flaws in Gauger’s work, the evo mat narrative cannot stand
Gordon Mullings
|
