skeptic
Posts: 1163
Joined: May 2006
|
| Quote (cewagner @ Aug. 16 2008,17:55) | | Quote | | Did you even read what I said? |
Not only did I read what you said, I went and read up on "Garden of Eden" patterns.
Don't get me wrong, I'm not just blowing you off. This interface between chaos theory and life is a subject that I have grappled with often.
In fact, it is safe to say that my understanding of it is still a "work in progress".
What continues to drive me on is an unshakable belief that a natural explanation will be found, that will fall squarely within the realm of science.
Debunking darwinism does not mean accepting religious creationism. All it means is that Darwin was wrong and we've got to keep looking for scientific explanations. |
Not to play devil's advocate, but how is that possible when ID completely removes itself from the realm of science?
Saying Darwin was wrong is one thing, and one I fully support, but saying he's wrong because of some unknown and undetectable intelligence is nothing more than faith. You might as well throw your lot in with YECs because you're playing in the same scientific ballpark.
Not trying to snipe here, but I'd really love to see just one example of how ID can be reconciled with scientific investigation.
|
