Ftk
Posts: 2239
Joined: Mar. 2007
|
| Quote (Albatrossity2 @ July 11 2008,20:21) | | Quote (Ftk @ July 11 2008,20:11) | Due time, big guy. I addressed Bill's last post with a lengthy post of my own, and here you are again acting as though I never address a thing.
Chill.
I'm in no mood to type out several pages of translation from Darwinism to Design today. |
You had a post that you alleged was a response to Bill's post, but it didn't really address the issues he raised. You had a long post on your blog that you alleged was a response to my arguments about icefish, but it also didn't address the issues. Going on at length about the various definitions of "species" was a nice touch, but the two icefish that I mentioned would be categorized as different species under all of those definitions. So you have basically agreed that macroevolution happened. Thanks.
So I'm not just "acting" as if you never address a thing. That is a verifiable fact.
At any rate, it won't take pages. If you have some argument as to why your opinion trumps my evidence, it shouldn't take more than a few sentences.
But I can wait. I'm sure that your response will be, per usual, evidence-free and opinion-rich. |
Well then I guess there's no point in addressing any of your posts Dave, because I believe I did answer your questions. I think the problem is that you still don't understand that I agree with much of what evolution postulates. You have this narrow vision of "Creationists" as some bizzarre religious cult that rejects science altogether.
--------------
"Evolution is a creationism and just as illogical [as] the other pantheistic creation myths" -forastero
|
