RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (1000) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   
  Topic: Official Uncommonly Dense Discussion Thread< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
PTET



Posts: 133
Joined: Jan. 2008

(Permalink) Posted: April 18 2008,04:29   

It's Tard Overdrive over at UD...
Quote

Berceuse
I’m disappointed in NewScientist for this. Anyone else feel conflicted when a magazine they otherwise enjoy taints their credibility with such naturalism?

Douglas Moran
If you’ve never played with Legos you won’t understand this concept: reuse of common building blocks is a strategy of design driven by intelligent forces, not by random serendipity.

Jonathan Sarfati
Barb, I also thought that chapter attacking the Bible was ludicrous. The christophobic author relies on suhc amazingly scholarly sources as Wikipedia...

This is truly a war of stupidity vs. reality.

--------------
"It’s not worth the effort to prove the obvious. Ridiculous ideas don’t deserve our time.
Even the attempt to formulate ID is a generous accommodation." - ScottAndrews

   
  29999 replies since Jan. 16 2006,11:43 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (1000) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]