Albatrossity2
Posts: 2780
Joined: Mar. 2007
|
| Quote (VMartin @ Mar. 27 2008,14:46) |
Why couldn't I back up my ideas with Portmann's or Davison's arguments? Did you invented "natural selection" or "random mutation" and do you consider them for your own ideas or what? You support your notion by arguments of neodarwinian scientists. So do I. |
Because, like you, they had no explanations of HOW these things were "prescribed", or WHEN they were "prescribed", or by WHOM they were "prescribed". If they did, please point us to those passages in their works, and indicate if you fully agree with these sages.
| Quote | | I also don't like your sentences like "So let's back up and try again." I am not here on interrogation and you are not the teacher. |
No, I am trying to learn by asking questions. I am the student; you are the teacher. Would you disallow questions by students? Or is it merely the case that you cannot answer them in a scientific manner?
Prescribed by who or what? And how was this prescription filled? And when was this "beginning"?
--------------
Flesh of the sky, child of the sky, the mind
Has been obligated from the beginning
To create an ordered universe
As the only possible proof of its own inheritance.
- Pattiann Rogers
|
