Mister DNA
Posts: 466
Joined: June 2007
|
| Quote (Arden Chatfield @ Mar. 16 2008,23:06) | This one was mentioned on the UD thread the other day, but it's SO GOOD it deserves to be honored even more:
By legendary UD tard Jerry:
| Quote | There are thousands of ID studies done every year. They are in the mainstream biology and evolution journals. They are just not identified as such.
Read DaveScot’s comment just above. Any research study that compares genomes of animals qualifies as an ID study despite the intentions of the researchers. ID predicts that genomes of species in the same family or genera will not have any meaningful differences that can be attributed to gradualism. This proposition is confirmed over and over again. |
|
That quote is too funny. In addition to the "real scientists be damned" attitude, while Jerry is implying that intent means squat, Granny Spice is at her new blog arguing that intent is of utmost importance.
Say it with me, friends:
--------------
CBEB's: The Church Burnin' Ebola Blog
Thank you, Dr. Dembski. You are without peer when it comes to The Argument Regarding Design. - vesf
|
